Feedback: Very good everything went smoothly ,the shed was erected in no time,I'm very Happy with it,sound job
Response: Thank you for your feedback and I'm pleased everything went well with your new Platinum Super Garden Workshop. I hope that you get many years of enjoyment utilising this workshop at your home. Regards Robin
With over thirty nine years experience in the garden & leisure building industry we can easily spot the difference between a good quality building and an exceptional one and we positively refuse to lower our standards. You can find cheaper buildings but you won't find better for delivery to Danbury. All of our partners have been carefully chosen to offer the finest selection of buildings, with the best after-sales service, at the very best prices.
We believe that it is vital that you are given the opportunity to inspect a building before parting with your so we have established easily-accessible display sites near Guildford in Surrey which is not too far away where you can come and view eighty buildings from all of our main ranges of buildings. You can browse at your leisure without worrying about any high pressure salesmen pouncing on you (not that we would employ that type in any case!). If you need any help then we are there to advise.
The above map will give you directions from Danbury to our display sites where you can our range of timber workshops, concrete garages, summerhouses, log cabins and garden sheds.
Our full range of timber (not log cabins) and concrete buildings will be installed free of charge at the time of delivery providing there is a suitable base. And if there isn't, don't worry, we can build that for you too for a small extra charge. Optional fitting service for log cabins.
Experts in garden sheds & buildings in timber, metal, plastic & concrete. And so much more so take a small drive and come and see us.
Back in 2009 ago the story broke about the MPs expenses scandal where MPs were claiming for all sort of things which they were not entitled to but because nearly everyone else was at it they felt they were entitled to claim as well so they did not miss out. With their main home changing depending on what work was required, to paying for gardening work including new garden sheds, summer houses as well as a ridiculous claims for a duck house. When all this came out everyone was disgusted with the attitude of the MP's and the MP's were disgusted at being caught out.
There were many MP's who paid a high price for their misdemeanours, some went to prison, after their claims for MP's to be above the law was thrown out. Probably the highest in government at the moment is the deputy Prime Minister, Nick Clegg, who was told to pay back gardening costs which he had claimed on expenses. Sir Thomas Legg sent Mr Clegg a letter after undertaking an audit of his parliamentary expenses as well as to 100's of other MP's.
On receiving this Mr Clegg made public his response noting that on Sir Thomas Legg's recommendation he had made a repayment of £910 for these gardening costs to the Department of Finance and Administration. Similarly many other MPs made a big pubic showing of how wonderful there are by waving cheques in the air showing their repayment. What would have happened to someone else who got caught, effectively obtaining goods wrongly, and then saying 'here you can have it back, aren't I good'. I'm pleased I was not in this situation as I'm sure the local police station would not have been interested in my explanation.
. It now appears that MP's are pushing for a flat rate system to pay for their accommodation and travel. With this flat rate in place receipts would not be needed and they would be able to either not pay out and pocket this allowance or if they did need to pay anything out would spend only a fraction of the allowance and again pocket the rest. What a great idea - for the MP's!! There would be no checks and they would be back on the gravy train and would be able to landscape their gardens and possibly replace their garden sheds with something more fitting to their high expectations. I'm not sure whether any MPs from Doncaster abused the system but why do they do it?
Is this right? What do you think? Should MPs be allowed to hide their allowances away?